![]() The issue is that employees are more aware than ever that the corporation cannot thrive without employees who are reasonably satisfied with their workplace. Those affected would certainly respond critically after overcoming disbelief, but that’s not what Apple is doing here.Īpple is trying a progressive policy as far as corporations go. ![]() I take this to mean that optional remote work days could be reduced or eliminated if whatever metric Apple is measuring is too low.Īpple could just as well have said that a complete return-to-work would be required with exceptions decided on a case-by-case basis. Tim Cook is also careful to describe the planned remote work policy as a pilot program that is subject to change. A more generous reading is that this formula optimizes for productivity based on data we don’t have. My guess is that simply choosing Thursday and Friday as optional remote days would provide too little friction for employees who choose to work this way. Specifying non-consecutive remote work days is certainly strategic. Specifically, Apple will designate Wednesday and Friday as optional remote work days while not offering remote work on Monday, Tuesday, or Thursday. Apple plans to test a hybrid work strategy that includes three on-site days and two remote work days per week. The internal letter includes feedback from Apple employees who are challenging CEO Tim Cook’s newly announced return-to-work plans. But his first take on the intention behind the internal letter and assertion that employees shouldn’t be vocal about company policy is something with which I sharply disagree. It’s easy to poke fun at John Gruber’s take on the internal letter from some Apple employees who are unhappy with the company’s return-to-work policy post-quarantine: Guy who works from home questions people who want to keep working from home.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |